Grumpty Google Had a Great Fall: Switch to Yahoo!

Google Vilifies PayPerPost and PayPerPost Fights Back

By now you may have heard about what Google did in attempt to destroy a small startup company, PayPerPost. The story goes like this:

Google invented PageRank. They set the secret criteria websites are assigned a rank from that called “Page Rank.”

When PayPerPost came on the scene, they paid bloggers to write posts on given topics. As with any open platform on the web, some abused it and wrote short meaningless posts that met the criteria of the job but were basiclly just filler posts with no new content. Having said that, there is still the large potenial for PayPerPost posts to be even more effective sources of info on the web (which I THINK Google would see as a good thing.) That’s why I was was shocked to find out that Google becaise a couple months ago stripping every blog with PayPerPosts on it to a zero page rank.

Now the big irony: To get the decent paying jobs on PayPerPost, you mch have a high Page Rank. Google not only sent all blog with PayPerPost to the bottom of the snake-pool but they alsocut off the life dollars of “posties,” as they are called who were once making $500/month writing quality articles.

Google is protecting its interests just like Microsoft tried to do by making Netscape incompatible with its software. Google is going to find that spam sites and services are much more prevalent that PayPerPost writers. Many I have spoken to are fed up with worry what Adolf-Google will find immoral so they are doing PayPerPost when it sounds interesting. I’m in this camp. If I get a great idea from PPP idea, I am going to write and link it . If Google think that make my writing spam, they can sit on their thumb and spin. I predict: Google will change or start falling in the next 5 years. They will not be the best company with tactics like these.

Related posts

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

RSS feed | Trackback URI

5 Comments »

Comment by John Hunter
2008-01-20 14:14:38

I am not as mad at Google as many are. But I have written several long posts on the pagerank/Google penalties topics: Google’s Displayed PageRank and Are Paid Links 100% Untrustworthy?. To me this amounts to whether Google is making a mistake (just from their own interests) and I think they are. Last October, I wrote: I believe that the move by Google to adjust public page ranks for some reasons (that do not appear to be related to actual "authority") has created an opening.

 
Comment by Damien Riley
2008-01-20 14:34:18

For some reason, John’s whole post didn’t show. Here is pt II.

I think it would be a great move to create a Page Authority rank along the lines of the authority of pages pointing to a page. Page Rank is often overstated in importance but it is an interesting figure to see. Since the Google one now seems to be inaccurate (for the way most people want to use it) a market exists for someone willing to provide such a rank. John Hunter’s last blog post..Creating Jobs

 
Comment by Damien Riley
2008-01-20 14:46:03

Yes John there is something wrong with that comment text, too may links? I will check it out. Worpress should be posting it but its not. I tested it 3 times myself and with two other commneters. Any guesses why your comment won’t show up? Sorry for the trouble. I will work on it.

 
Comment by John Hunter
2008-01-26 14:13:44

No ideas - too many links makes sense. Other than that I am not sure. Thanks for posting it.

John Hunter’s last blog post..Learn from Russel Ackoff

 
Name (required)
E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
URI
Your Comment (smaller size | larger size)
You may use <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> in your comment.

Trackback responses to this post